It has been 16 years since the government embarked on the upgrading of HDB estates, with mature estates such as Marine Parade and Toa Payoh being given a facelift and a new lease of life. While most of the island has undergone some measure of upgrading or improvement works in some way or another, there are glaring omissions – in the form of the Potong Pasir and Hougang constituencies.
The reason for such as explained by National Development Minister Mah Bow Tan is because residents of the two constituencies have refused to give the Government their mandate to carry out such policies, by remaining defiant and voting for the opposition. However, what perturbs me as such is that while the Government explains and defends its position in a seemingly rational and calculative manner in implementing its selective development policy it seems to contradict its official stand on upgrading in general.
“The Main Upgrading Programme (MUP) was launched by the Government in 1990 to enhance the overall living environment of HDB estates. It is part of the Government's continual efforts to enhance the quality of life of Singaporeans through its public housing programme.”- HDB
If we are to conclude the above statement in a logical manner, it seems that if the Main Upgrading Programme’s objective is to enhance the quality of life of Singaporeans then the Government has also decided that some Singaporeans should be left behind – or at least kept right in the back of the line. And that’s where the problem lies.
While we pledge to build a Singapore “based on justice and equality,” it appears that our very own leaders are not completely sold on the idea of equality or “one people, one nation, one Singapore”. By keeping Singaporeans that do not vote for PAP behind the rest, we see the arbitrary practice of equality. It is the duty of any Government, PAP-led or not, to ensure that the rights of its people protected, to ensure that the people have enough jobs, to ensure that everyone benefits from an enhanced quality of life of Singaporeans. Moreover, it is public housing that we are talking about.
Next I ask: should we be penalised by what we believe? Should those who exercise their democratic rights be sidelined?
What appears with the case of residents in Potong Pasir and Hougang is that they are being punished for exercising their fundamental liberties guaranteed in the Constitution that our sons, brothers and fathers have sworn to protect and where our ministers have taken an oath to uphold. They have exercised their right to vote: to democracy. By snubbing their noses at the PAP and refusing to hand over the long-held opposition wards, they lost their right and entitlement to a better quality of life. To some in Potong Pasir and Hougang, they may have regretted for making that choice of voting for something they believed in. To the rest of the nation, it sends a signal to Singaporeans: you will be punished for taking part in the democratic process. The whole idea of democracy is to allow people the chance to choose what they want and what they believe in. To be punished for doing so simply deters Singaporeans from wanting to have anything to do with the political and democratic process whatsoever. Whether or not this is the intention of the Government is not for me to judge, but this is the very signal they are sending.
Judging from the Government’s response thus far, it therefore comes as no surprise that Mr Mah was surprised that “bread and butter” issues are not the top concern of voters in this election. The very fact that the PAP attempted to hold voters hostage by threatening to remove welfare benefits in the form of upgrading is a telling sign that perhaps, the PAP has somewhat lost touch with the concerns of Singaporeans.
I think this is a result of some 40 odd years of spectacular development, no less due to the efforts of the PAP, that right now Singaporeans are no longer so concerned about the “bread and butter” as they are before. It is high time we embrace the fact that Singapore is no longer “third-world” anymore. As Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew noted in the title of his book, “From Third World to First”, we are no longer the third world island state we used to be. Singapore no longer has to fight through its teeth for its survival.
Of course, Singapore still faces many challenges. So does the United States, and Australia, and the United Kingdom – pretty much the entire world today. At every stage of a nation’s development there will always be challenges faced, but these challenges evolve and change over time as a country progresses. Do we face the same challenges that we used to 40 years ago? The answer is a resounding no. At that point in time, the primary concern was finding a way to feed, clothe, house and educate Singaporeans. 40 years on and possessing one of the world’s highest GDP rates, our concerns have varied quite a bit. What is the Singaporean dream now?
10 years ago, it might have been the 5 C’s (condo, credit card, car, country club, and cash). Now, it is really up to the younger Singaporeans born after 1965 to decide. From the looks of the recently concluded General Elections where young blood made quite the difference, it is pretty obvious that money-politics and basic economics will not satisfy them. A 66% victory for the Prime Minister against a rookie suicide team of young opposition candidates is by no means a landslide victory for the PAP.
Personally, I may represent the generation of Singaporeans that has never been through the hardships of the nation’s teething years. I can never empathise with what it means to survive on just dark soy sauce and rice, nor can I ever share the same fears of those having to live through the turmoil of the riots, because I thankfully never had to go through any of that. For that precise reason, I have different wants from my parents and my grandparents who have been through all of that. What I want is perhaps less pragmatic than what they wanted; I have lofty goals, but they are no less desirable. I want the ability to make my own choices, and the ability to exercise my liberties, such as free speech, press and so on. This is where the Government is unwilling to let go, and this is where I feel pushed away and disenfranchised by the Government.
Perhaps the Government should let go now, like a parent letting his child go out into the real world. It will be painful, but it has to be done eventually. How well or how badly it is done will perhaps determine the political landscape in Singapore in the years to come.
In 2011, I will be able to vote. Will I be a citizen left behind, or will it the other way around?






